Re: [BTSS] Karamazov

Sunday, February 27, 2011

 

I noticed how the Sternguard were similar to DW marines. At least ammo
wise...worse comes to worse, I still have DWKT rules.

________________________________
From: blackhalfdragon <fareunfan@eircom.net>
To: battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, February 21, 2011 1:38:15 PM
Subject: Re: [BTSS] Karamazov

I think that they are as the inquisition gave the impression that the respective
orders had the various arms under their thumbs all the time. The DW RPG doesn't
seem to give that impression.

I wonder if they will reprint some of the characters verbatim from the GK codex
although I doubt it.

Also sternguard suit the DW role in a marine army. If your opponent was nice
they could give you prefferred enemy (xenos) or something..

--- In battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com, d m <nato_potato_2006@...> wrote:
>
> Call me old school, but Grey Knights have always been the militant arm of the
> Ordo Malleus. Just like Sisters are the militant arm of the Ordo Hereticus and
>
> Deathwatch are to the Ordo Xenos.
>
> I hope GW isn't rewriting the Inquisition. With the new Deathwatch RPG books
> out and all my DWKT figs I have, I'd be rightly pissed.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "fredegar@..." <fredegar@...>
> To: battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, February 21, 2011 11:34:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [BTSS] Karamazov
>
>
> The entry for Inquisitors states that the Grey Knights are the Chamber Militant
>
> of the Inquisition and that the Ordo Malleus calls upon them the most.
>
> If the 'leaked' Grey Knights codex is accurate then by all appearances it would
>
> seem that the Inquisition and the Adepta Sororitas are seperating. This would
> also mean that Ordo Xenos lose the Deathwatch.
>
> Whatever the case may be, Karamazov is still in the Witch Hunter Codex and I
> feel that he is somewhat better stat wise and rule wise in our codex version. I
>
> never field him and do not plan to.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment