Re: [BTSS] April 1!!

I love, love, love my zealots with eviscerator fanatics. Call them "redemptionist militia if you must, but keep their eviscerators! :)

On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:29 PM, "johnlay95" <john_lay@att.net> wrote:

> I do not have a problem with the small squad size or the transports coming back to the units. The points look good as well. The two things I do not like are Vet. Sis. get no Ev. for HTH and still no heavy weapon for the unit at all now, no HB; MM; HF.
> Sisters are very weak in HTH, I have found that one Ev. in the unit makes a difference where a PW will not, wound on a 5-6 PW or 2+ for Ev.. List looks like it still need some work. The have also taken the Fanatics out of the Red. unit which makes them mostly useless. Reb. with Fanatics with Ev. + a Priest on the change makes for a dead unit of anything most of the time.
>
> Just some thoughts.
>
> John
>
> --- In battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com, "Kensai" <theswordsaint@...> wrote:
>>
>> Actually,
>>
>> these leaked pages are similar to the leaked GK ones.
>>
>> In addition, the statlines and rules for the units listed jive with where they should be.
>>
>> the sister squad build is a throwback to the old build- 5 sister minimum up to two special weapons in a unit and immolators for troops.
>>
>> I find no issue with them- they look fairly balanced to this old salt.
>>
>> -John T.
>>
>> --- In battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com, "johnlay95" <john_lay@> wrote:
>>>
>>> We can only hope that this is fake, with these rule SOB would be almost unplayable! I could write a better codex with my 5 year old! We need to get a meta codex put together and than leak it just to make people SH*T their pants.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>