Re: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW

You should play multiple detachments in Apocalypse.

--- In battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com, <andrewm9@...> wrote:
>
> Teh two formations are nice becuase GW are payign attention, but functionly they aren't the greatest formations. The heavy weapon is very vulnerable to losign its special ability becuase all it takes is one Immolator in a team to lose its weapon and now one team can no longer contrinute to the special attack.
>
> The Repentia/Penitent Engine one is nice though because a potetnial use of Preferred Enemy and the improvement of invuln save to 5+ along with the Repentia getting Feel no Pain on 3+ is sweet.
>
> I think someone at GW realized that sales have suffered due to zero support from the design team. Still Sisters need soem stratagems and more still more formations. Also they could use some rules for extended army sizes at 1d6 Faith points a trun won't be enough support in Apocalypse. In a typical Apoc game I will put down 17+ units of Sisters not coutnign transports or other tanks. 1d6 points won't cut it. Who else has a special rule so strictfully applied?
>
> Andrew
>
> ---- johnlay95 <john_lay@...> wrote:
> > I would not call it love because it has been so poor. The SOB have been getting some attention as of late though. Since Aug. WD update there has been some small SOB thing in every WD Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. and Dec. In the Dec. WD we get 2 new AP data sheets I can not say either is very good but they are there. Why after so many years of nothing is there so much all of the sudden?
> >
> > Some some things to think about.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>