RE: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

I know Matt Ward's name is on this codex, but the majority coudl not have been written by him, but by his cohort Cruddace. I woudl have preferred it the otehr way around. At least we would have a solid codex rules wise. There are no over the top units. The only mark I see of his is the Battle Conclave and those models were written in the Grey Knights codex.

Andrew

---- Amanda Fujioka <fushigithedruid@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> honestly, i don't know what to fully think. matt ward is a meh writer for codex updates. didn't know that there was more articles on SoB in more recent WD since Sept. maybe GW are finally getting their heads out of their collective a****. dunno, we'll see in the near future
>
> Fushigi
>
> To: battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com
> From: john_lay@att.net
> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:20:33 +0000
> Subject: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I would not call it love because it has been so poor. The SOB have been getting some attention as of late though. Since Aug. WD update there has been some small SOB thing in every WD Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. and Dec. In the Dec. WD we get 2 new AP data sheets I can not say either is very good but they are there. Why after so many years of nothing is there so much all of the sudden?
>
>
>
> Some some things to think about.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>