Re: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW

Well, yeah, the rules are the important thing here, but backing those rules with plastic would have been appreciated. Obviously their creative energies were devoted to the latest round of Necron toys, but a set of Sisters' door panels, purity seals, et al would have been nice. Heck, just selling the Immolator sprue seperately would have been cool.

--- On Wed, 11/30/11, pzbw7z <dgibson8@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

From: pzbw7z <dgibson8@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW
To: battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2011, 8:05 PM

Who needs bitz? Just give us the rules.

--- In battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com, gordon nichols <gsteelwraith@...> wrote:
>
> So, you're suggesting the attention the Sisters have recieved of late is more to push magazine sales than actually sell miniatures? Also, why have they not allowed us to pick up other units? I can understand them not wanting to create entirely new original, army-centric models, as they had for....every other army, but how hard could it ahve been to simply cast up some bitz packs to convert up Valkyries, or Stormravens, or heck, even a Repressor? Even a cheap bitz pack would have gone along way to pick this army up off its knees.
>
> --- On Wed, 11/30/11, Tom Lynch <rowport@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Tom Lynch <rowport@...>
> Subject: Re: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW
> To: "battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com" <battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: "battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com" <battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2011, 11:40 AM
>
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
> Once GW committed to having rules in White Dwarf again (not just Sisters codex but also WHFB monster stats) it only makes sense to keep it up. That way anybody who came back to the mag for the new stuff keeps getting it even if only little bits like apoc datasheets.
>
> FWIW I think the first Sisters one sucked but the second with fleets of meltas or flamers is pretty good.
>
> On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:20 AM, "johnlay95" <john_lay@...> wrote:
>
> > I would not call it love because it has been so poor. The SOB have been getting some attention as of late though. Since Aug. WD update there has been some small SOB thing in every WD Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. and Dec. In the Dec. WD we get 2 new AP data sheets I can not say either is very good but they are there. Why after so many years of nothing is there so much all of the sudden?
> >
> > Some some things to think about.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]