RE: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW

But the Necrons still got more pages in a single issue than we have over four.... <sigh>

But I'm not trying to sell more Necron models :-)

To: battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com
From: andrewm9@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:57:20 -0500
Subject: Re: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW

Yes I believe we have gotten more WD articles in the last few months since the codex came out than we have in the last 5 years perhaps even since the last codex came out.

---- Tom Lynch <rowport@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hmm-- interesting. OK, I will take another look. Thanks for the tip!
>
> Also, in case anybody missed it, I quite enjoyed the Sisters article in the November WD about Duncan Rhodes' army. Whether or not it is just to sell Sisters backstock or not, I liked seeing a hobby article about my favorite army. :)
>
> --- On Wed, 11/30/11, pzbw7z <dgibson8@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > From: pzbw7z <dgibson8@sbcglobal.net>
> > Subject: Re: [BTSS] SOB attention by GW
> > To: battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2011, 7:03 PM
> > Actually the first data sheet is a
> > huge buff to some fairly sucky units. It might even work in
> > Apocalypse since one isn't limited by the SoB crap-dex.
> >
> > That isn't to say that the formation is killer, just that
> > the datasheet is a big boost for 50 points. Removing Rage,
> > boosting FnP and Shield of Faith? It's pretty good.
> >
> > The second one just strikes me as silly.
> >
> > --- In battle-sisters@yahoogroups.com,
> > Tom Lynch <rowport@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Once GW committed to having rules in White Dwarf again
> > (not just Sisters codex but also WHFB monster stats) it only
> > makes sense to keep it up. That way anybody who came back to
> > the mag for the new stuff keeps getting it even if only
> > little bits like apoc datasheets.
> > >
> > > FWIW I think the first Sisters one sucked but the
> > second with fleets of meltas or flamers is pretty good.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:20 AM, "johnlay95"
> > <john_lay@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would not call it love because it has been so
> > poor. The SOB have been getting some attention as of
> > late though. Since Aug. WD update there has been some
> > small SOB thing in every WD Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. and
> > Dec. In the Dec. WD we get 2 new AP data sheets I can
> > not say either is very good but they are there. Why
> > after so many years of nothing is there so much all of the
> > sudden?
> > > >
> > > > Some some things to think about.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> > battle-sisters-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/battle-sisters/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/battle-sisters/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
battle-sisters-digest@yahoogroups.com
battle-sisters-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
battle-sisters-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/