Oversized characters are nice for fantasy, but not for WAB. The look of our armies should encourage maneuver and tactics, not where the cold-blooded killers are. Ulfendar noteably excepted of course.
I have TAG Samurai (no Magificient Seven or D&D 12th level Monks, thank you very much). Sad they can't be mixed with anybody else's. It's too bad since the Perry stuff is very nice while Minifigs, Ral Partha and even Lot5R stuff can be found in bits bins easily enough.
Allen
--- In WABlist@yahoogroups.com, "nikephros" <jnobianchi@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In WABlist@yahoogroups.com, "Jonas, Jeff" <jjonas@> wrote:
> >
> > For the seven of you who are not on TMP:
> > http://ancientbattles.com/antiochus_ptolemy/antiochus_ptolemy.htm
> >
>
>
> "...a rolled up papyrus of his beloved Homer..." :D Thanks for that, Jeff. Excellent review.
>
> I'm a fan of keeping 28mm to 28mm. I find I'm really liking eBob's 28mm Mongols over TAGs these days, because they look good individually and on the table. TAGs - which measure up at over 30mm - make the table look crowded and scenery look small.
>
> Has anyone noticed with new plastics if there's a significant amount of scale creep overall? GB's look to be the same size as their metal counterparts, but those, as great as they are, are already on the big side.
>
Post message: WABlist@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: WABlist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: WABlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: WABlist-owner@yahoo.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.yahoo.com/community/WABlist
No comments:
Post a Comment